首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of Online 6 Degree-of-Freedom Image Registration of Varian TrueBeam Cone-Beam CT and BrainLab ExacTrac X-Ray for Intracranial Radiosurgery.
【2h】

Comparison of Online 6 Degree-of-Freedom Image Registration of Varian TrueBeam Cone-Beam CT and BrainLab ExacTrac X-Ray for Intracranial Radiosurgery.

机译:用于颅内放射外科的Varian TrueBeam锥束CT和BrainLab ExacTrac X射线在线6自由度图像配准的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

PURPOSE: The study was aimed to compare online 6 degree-of-freedom image registrations of TrueBeam cone-beam computed tomography and BrainLab ExacTrac X-ray imaging systems for intracranial radiosurgery.METHODS: Phantom and patient studies were performed on a Varian TrueBeam STx linear accelerator (version 2.5), which is integrated with a BrainLab ExacTrac imaging system (version 6.1.1). The phantom study was based on a Rando head phantom and was designed to evaluate isocenter location dependence of the image registrations. Ten isocenters at various locations representing clinical treatment sites were selected in the phantom. Cone-beam computed tomography and ExacTrac X-ray images were taken when the phantom was located at each isocenter. The patient study included 34 patients. Cone-beam computed tomography and ExacTrac X-ray images were taken at each patient\u27s treatment position. The 6 degree-of-freedom image registrations were performed on cone-beam computed tomography and ExacTrac, and residual errors calculated from cone-beam computed tomography and ExacTrac were compared.RESULTS: In the phantom study, the average residual error differences (absolute values) between cone-beam computed tomography and ExacTrac image registrations were 0.17 ± 0.11 mm, 0.36 ± 0.20 mm, and 0.25 ± 0.11 mm in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. The average residual error differences in the rotation, roll, and pitch were 0.34° ± 0.08°, 0.13° ± 0.09°, and 0.12° ± 0.10°, respectively. In the patient study, the average residual error differences in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions were 0.20 ± 0.16 mm, 0.30 ± 0.18 mm, 0.21 ± 0.18 mm, respectively. The average residual error differences in the rotation, roll, and pitch were 0.40°± 0.16°, 0.17° ± 0.13°, and 0.20° ± 0.14°, respectively. Overall, the average residual error differences were
机译:目的:本研究旨在比较用于颅内放射外科手术的TrueBeam锥形束计算机断层扫描和BrainLab ExacTrac X射线成像系统的在线6自由度图像配准。方法:在Varian TrueBeam STx linear上进行幻像和患者研究加速器(2.5版),与BrainLab ExacTrac成像系统(6.1.1版)集成在一起。幻像研究基于Rando头部幻像,旨在评估图像配准的等中心点位置依赖性。在幻像中选择了代表临床治疗部位的不同位置的十个等中心。当体模位于每个等中心点时,将获取锥形束计算机断层扫描和ExacTrac X射线图像。病人研究包括34名病人。在每个患者的治疗位置拍摄锥形束计算机断层扫描和ExacTrac X射线图像。在锥束计算机断层扫描和ExacTrac上进行了6个自由度图像配准,并比较了锥束计算机断层扫描和ExacTrac计算出的残留误差。结果:在幻像研究中,平均残留误差差异(绝对值)锥束计算机断层扫描和ExacTrac图像配准之间在垂直,纵向和横向方向上分别为0.17±0.11 mm,0.36±0.20 mm和0.25±0.11 mm。旋转,滚动和俯仰的平均残余误差差异分别为0.34°±0.08°,0.13°±0.09°和0.12°±0.10°。在患者研究中,垂直,纵向和横向的平均残留误差差异分别为0.20±0.16 mm,0.30±0.18 mm,0.21±0.18 mm。旋转,滚动和俯仰的平均残余误差差分别为0.40°±0.16°,0.17°±0.13°和0.20°±0.14°。总体而言,平均残留误差差异为

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号